17 March 2023
by: Zachary Cefaratti
In mergers and acquisitions (M&A), the closing mechanisms plays a crucial role in determining the final purchase price. Two common methods for settling the purchase price are completion accounts and locked box mechanisms. This article will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, factors to consider when choosing the most suitable option, and statistics about their prevalence in M&A deals.
Completion accounts are financial statements prepared at the closing of a transaction, reflecting the target company’s financial position at that point in time. The purchase price is adjusted based on the net asset value or working capital at completion.
In a locked box mechanism, the purchase price is determined based on the target company’s financial position at a pre-agreed date (the locked box date) and is not subject to adjustments. The buyer assumes the risk of changes in the target company’s financial performance between the locked box date and closing.
According to the 2020 CMS European M&A Study, the locked box mechanism has become increasingly popular in recent years, with 53% of deals using this approach. In contrast, completion accounts were used in 47% of transactions. However, the prevalence of each mechanism varies across industries and regions, and these statistics should be considered as a general indication.
The choice between completion accounts and locked box mechanisms in M&A transactions depends on factors such as the desired transaction timeline, risk appetite of the parties involved, and the quality of the target company’s financial information. By carefully considering these factors and the advantages and disadvantages of each closing mechanism, sellers and buyers can make informed decisions and navigate the M&A process more effectively.
To know more about Zachary and his insights, please click here.
To access the Article, please click here.